1962 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2005 Spyker C8
To start off, 2005 Spyker C8 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 725 kg more than 2005 Spyker C8.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Ford Thunderbird | 2005 Spyker C8 | |
| Make | Ford | Spyker |
| Model | Thunderbird | C8 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 6964 cc | 4172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 345 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1090 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2560 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 100 L |
