1962 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2006 Volvo S60

To start off, 2006 Volvo S60 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 2006 Volvo S60. (139 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2006 Volvo S60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 374 kg more than 2006 Volvo S60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo S60, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Ford Thunderbird 2006 Volvo S60
Make Ford Volvo
Model Thunderbird S60
Year Released 1962 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6964 cc 2435 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 345 HP 139 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 4500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1875 kg 1501 kg
Vehicle Length 5210 mm 4580 mm
Vehicle Width 1930 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 2720 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 L 70 L