1962 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2008 Mazda 6
To start off, 2008 Mazda 6 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 581 kg more than 2008 Mazda 6.
Because 1962 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Thunderbird | 2008 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Thunderbird | 6 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6964 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1294 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 64 L |