1962 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2008 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2008 Subaru Outback is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2008 Subaru Outback. (245 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2008 Subaru Outback. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 290 kg more than 2008 Subaru Outback. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Subaru Outback is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Subaru Outback will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Thunderbird | 2008 Subaru Outback | |
Make | Ford | Subaru |
Model | Thunderbird | Outback |
Year Released | 1962 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6964 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 64 L |