1962 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2009 Audi A5
To start off, 2009 Audi A5 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2009 Audi A5. (261 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2009 Audi A5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 339 kg more than 2009 Audi A5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Audi A5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Audi A5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Ford Thunderbird | 2009 Audi A5 | |
| Make | Ford | Audi |
| Model | Thunderbird | A5 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6964 cc | 3197 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 345 HP | 261 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1536 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 64 L |
