1962 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2009 Mazda 6
To start off, 2009 Mazda 6 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 2009 Mazda 6. (146 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2009 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 581 kg more than 2009 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Thunderbird | 2009 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Thunderbird | 6 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6964 cc | 1999 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 146 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1294 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 64 L |