1962 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2009 Nissan Note
To start off, 2009 Nissan Note is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP) has 256 more horse power than 2009 Nissan Note. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2009 Nissan Note. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 823 kg more than 2009 Nissan Note. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Note, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Thunderbird | 2009 Nissan Note | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Thunderbird | Note |
Year Released | 1962 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6964 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1052 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1691 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2600 mm |