1962 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2010 Audi TT
To start off, 2010 Audi TT is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 2010 Audi TT. (168 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2010 Audi TT.
Because 2010 Audi TT is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Thunderbird | 2010 Audi TT | |
Make | Ford | Audi |
Model | Thunderbird | TT |
Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6964 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 60 L |