1962 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2010 Volvo S80
To start off, 2010 Volvo S80 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2010 Volvo S80. (311 HP @ 5950 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2010 Volvo S80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo S80 weights approximately 4 kg more than 1962 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 2010 Volvo S80 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo S80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Ford Thunderbird | 2010 Volvo S80 | |
| Make | Ford | Volvo |
| Model | Thunderbird | S80 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6964 cc | 4400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 345 HP | 311 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5950 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1879 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4851 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1862 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1494 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2835 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 70 L |
