1962 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2011 BMW X6
To start off, 2011 BMW X6 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 BMW X6 (480 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 BMW X6 should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 BMW X6 weights approximately 740 kg more than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 BMW X6 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 BMW X6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Thunderbird | 2011 BMW X6 | |
Make | Ford | BMW |
Model | Thunderbird | X6 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6964 cc | 4400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 480 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 2615 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4879 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1984 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1689 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2934 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 85 L |