1962 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML (503 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 435 kg more than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Thunderbird | 2011 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Ford | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Thunderbird | ML |
Year Released | 1962 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6964 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 503 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 2310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1951 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1862 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2913 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 95 L |