1962 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2012 Land Rover LR4
To start off, 2012 Land Rover LR4 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Land Rover LR4 (375 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover LR4 should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Land Rover LR4 weights approximately 673 kg more than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Land Rover LR4 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover LR4 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Thunderbird | 2012 Land Rover LR4 | |
Make | Ford | Land Rover |
Model | Thunderbird | LR4 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6964 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 375 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 2548 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4829 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1915 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1882 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2885 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 86 L |