1962 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2012 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2012 Volvo XC70 is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 105 more horse power than 2012 Volvo XC70. (240 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2012 Volvo XC70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo XC70 weights approximately 6 kg more than 1962 Ford Thunderbird.
Because 1962 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volvo XC70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Thunderbird | 2012 Volvo XC70 | |
Make | Ford | Volvo |
Model | Thunderbird | XC70 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6964 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1875 kg | 1881 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5210 mm | 4838 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1604 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2815 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 40 L | 70 L |