1962 Ford Thunderbird vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,964 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Thunderbird (345 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2013 Cadillac XTS. (314 HP @ 6800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2013 Cadillac XTS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 58 kg more than 2013 Cadillac XTS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1962 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1962 Ford Thunderbird 2013 Cadillac XTS
Make Ford Cadillac
Model Thunderbird XTS
Year Released 1962 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6964 cc 3564 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 345 HP 314 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1875 kg 1817 kg
Vehicle Length 5210 mm 5131 mm
Vehicle Width 1930 mm 1852 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 2831 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 40 L 72 L