1962 Ford Zephyr vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Ford Zephyr is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Ford Zephyr (103 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Ford Zephyr should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda CU-X weights approximately 166 kg more than 1962 Ford Zephyr.
Because 1962 Ford Zephyr is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Ford Zephyr. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Mazda CU-X (240 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Ford Zephyr. (185 Nm). This means 2001 Mazda CU-X will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Ford Zephyr.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Zephyr | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Zephyr | CU-X |
Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 185 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1179 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 80 L |