1962 Ford Zephyr vs. 2005 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2005 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 2,495 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Ford Zephyr is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda RX-8 (197 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1962 Ford Zephyr. (103 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Zephyr. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda RX-8 weights approximately 206 kg more than 1962 Ford Zephyr. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda RX-8 (222 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Ford Zephyr. (185 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda RX-8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Ford Zephyr.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Ford Zephyr | 2005 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Zephyr | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2495 cc | 1311 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 185 Nm | 222 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1179 kg | 1385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 60 L |