1962 Holden EK vs. 1951 Jeep CJ3A
To start off, 1962 Holden EK is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Jeep CJ3A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Jeep CJ3A would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Holden EK (64 HP) has 5 more horse power than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Holden EK should accelerate faster than 1951 Jeep CJ3A.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Holden EK (164 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Jeep CJ3A. (145 Nm). This means 1962 Holden EK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Jeep CJ3A.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Holden EK | 1951 Jeep CJ3A | |
Make | Holden | Jeep |
Model | EK | CJ3A |
Year Released | 1962 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 164 Nm | 145 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |