1962 Holden EK vs. 1951 Rover P4
To start off, 1962 Holden EK is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Rover P4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Rover P4 would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1951 Rover P4 (75 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1951 Rover P4 should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Holden EK (164 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1951 Rover P4. (150 Nm). This means 1962 Holden EK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1951 Rover P4.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 1951 Rover P4 | |
| Make | Holden | Rover |
| Model | EK | P4 |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1951 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2103 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 75 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
