1962 Holden EK vs. 1956 Hudson Metropolitan
To start off, 1962 Holden EK is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Hudson Metropolitan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Hudson Metropolitan would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Holden EK (64 HP) has 17 more horse power than 1956 Hudson Metropolitan. (47 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Holden EK should accelerate faster than 1956 Hudson Metropolitan.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Holden EK (164 Nm) has 64 more torque (in Nm) than 1956 Hudson Metropolitan. (100 Nm). This means 1962 Holden EK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1956 Hudson Metropolitan.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Holden EK | 1956 Hudson Metropolitan | |
Make | Holden | Hudson |
Model | EK | Metropolitan |
Year Released | 1962 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 47 HP |
Torque | 164 Nm | 100 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |