1962 Holden EK vs. 1966 Mercury Comet
To start off, 1966 Mercury Comet is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,279 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Comet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Comet (118 HP) has 54 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Comet should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Mercury Comet (258 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 1966 Mercury Comet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 1966 Mercury Comet | |
| Make | Holden | Mercury |
| Model | EK | Comet |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3279 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 118 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 258 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
