1962 Holden EK vs. 1966 Mercury Cyclone
To start off, 1966 Mercury Cyclone is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 6,393 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Mercury Cyclone is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Mercury Cyclone (335 HP) has 271 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Mercury Cyclone should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Mercury Cyclone (579 Nm) has 415 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 1966 Mercury Cyclone will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 1966 Mercury Cyclone | |
| Make | Holden | Mercury |
| Model | EK | Cyclone |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 6393 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 335 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 579 Nm |
