1962 Holden EK vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP) has 29 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Holden EK (164 Nm) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm). This means 1962 Holden EK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | EK | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 93 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
