1962 Holden EK vs. 1980 Triumph Spitfire
To start off, 1980 Triumph Spitfire is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Triumph Spitfire (71 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Triumph Spitfire should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Holden EK (164 Nm) has 53 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Triumph Spitfire. (111 Nm). This means 1962 Holden EK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Triumph Spitfire.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 1980 Triumph Spitfire | |
| Make | Holden | Triumph |
| Model | EK | Spitfire |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1493 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 71 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 111 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
