1962 Holden EK vs. 1983 Jaguar XJS
To start off, 1983 Jaguar XJS is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,590 cc (6 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Jaguar XJS (226 HP) has 162 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Jaguar XJS should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Jaguar XJS (325 Nm) has 161 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 1983 Jaguar XJS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 1983 Jaguar XJS | |
| Make | Holden | Jaguar |
| Model | EK | XJS |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3590 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 226 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 325 Nm |
