1962 Holden EK vs. 1983 Mitsubishi Debonair
To start off, 1983 Mitsubishi Debonair is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,555 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Mitsubishi Debonair is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Mitsubishi Debonair (111 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Mitsubishi Debonair should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Mitsubishi Debonair (206 Nm) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 1983 Mitsubishi Debonair will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 1983 Mitsubishi Debonair | |
| Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
| Model | EK | Debonair |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1983 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2555 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 111 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 206 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
