1962 Holden EK vs. 1983 Oldsmobile Omega
To start off, 1983 Oldsmobile Omega is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Oldsmobile Omega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Oldsmobile Omega (89 HP) has 25 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Oldsmobile Omega should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Oldsmobile Omega (183 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 1983 Oldsmobile Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Holden EK | 1983 Oldsmobile Omega | |
Make | Holden | Oldsmobile |
Model | EK | Omega |
Year Released | 1962 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2474 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 164 Nm | 183 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |