1962 Holden EK vs. 1993 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 1993 Nissan Pulsar is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1993 Nissan Pulsar (108 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1993 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Holden EK (164 Nm) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 1993 Nissan Pulsar. (148 Nm). This means 1962 Holden EK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1993 Nissan Pulsar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 1993 Nissan Pulsar | |
| Make | Holden | Nissan |
| Model | EK | Pulsar |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1993 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
