1962 Holden EK vs. 1994 Mazda 626
To start off, 1994 Mazda 626 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Mazda 626 (74 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1994 Mazda 626 (172 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 1994 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Holden EK | 1994 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Holden | Mazda |
Model | EK | 626 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 164 Nm | 172 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |