1962 Holden EK vs. 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass (158 HP) has 94 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass (251 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Holden EK | 1995 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Holden | Oldsmobile |
Model | EK | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1962 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3135 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 158 HP |
Torque | 164 Nm | 251 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |