1962 Holden EK vs. 1997 Proton 300
To start off, 1997 Proton 300 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Proton 300 (75 HP) has 11 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Proton 300 should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Holden EK (164 Nm) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Proton 300. (108 Nm). This means 1962 Holden EK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Proton 300.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Holden EK | 1997 Proton 300 | |
Make | Holden | Proton |
Model | EK | 300 |
Year Released | 1962 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 75 HP |
Torque | 164 Nm | 108 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |