1962 Holden EK vs. 1998 Mitsubishi Diamante
To start off, 1998 Mitsubishi Diamante is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Mitsubishi Diamante is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mitsubishi Diamante (238 HP) has 174 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mitsubishi Diamante should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1998 Mitsubishi Diamante (310 Nm) has 146 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 1998 Mitsubishi Diamante will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 1998 Mitsubishi Diamante | |
| Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
| Model | EK | Diamante |
| Year Released | 1962 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2972 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 238 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
