1962 Holden EK vs. 2000 Lancia Zeta
To start off, 2000 Lancia Zeta is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lancia Zeta (145 HP) has 81 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lancia Zeta should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Lancia Zeta (235 Nm) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2000 Lancia Zeta will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Holden EK | 2000 Lancia Zeta | |
Make | Holden | Lancia |
Model | EK | Zeta |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 145 HP |
Torque | 164 Nm | 235 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |