1962 Holden EK vs. 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL (217 HP) has 153 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL (316 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Holden EK | 2000 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | EK | SL |
Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 217 HP |
Torque | 164 Nm | 316 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |