1962 Holden EK vs. 2000 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2000 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Oldsmobile Cutlass (150 HP) has 86 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Oldsmobile Cutlass (249 Nm) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2000 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2000 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Holden | Oldsmobile |
| Model | EK | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3135 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 150 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 249 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
