1962 Holden EK vs. 2001 Opel Omega
To start off, 2001 Opel Omega is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Opel Omega (108 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Opel Omega should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Opel Omega (280 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2001 Opel Omega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2001 Opel Omega | |
| Make | Holden | Opel |
| Model | EK | Omega |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2172 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
