1962 Holden EK vs. 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 4,966 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK (301 HP) has 237 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK (460 Nm) has 296 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2002 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
| Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | EK | CLK |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 4966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 301 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 460 Nm |
