1962 Holden EK vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (109 HP) has 45 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Holden | Ford |
| Model | EK | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
