1962 Holden EK vs. 2003 Mahindra CL
To start off, 2003 Mahindra CL is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,523 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mahindra CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Holden EK (64 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2003 Mahindra CL. (62 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Holden EK should accelerate faster than 2003 Mahindra CL.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mahindra CL (165 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2003 Mahindra CL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Holden EK | 2003 Mahindra CL | |
Make | Holden | Mahindra |
Model | EK | CL |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2523 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 62 HP |
Torque | 164 Nm | 165 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |