1962 Holden EK vs. 2003 Mazda Demio
To start off, 2003 Mazda Demio is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Holden EK (64 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2003 Mazda Demio. (62 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1962 Holden EK should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda Demio.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Holden EK (164 Nm) has 63 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda Demio. (101 Nm). This means 1962 Holden EK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda Demio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2003 Mazda Demio | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | EK | Demio |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1323 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 62 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
