1962 Holden EK vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 5,513 cc (12 cylinders), 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL (493 HP) has 429 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL (800 Nm) has 636 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Holden EK | 2003 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | EK | SL |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 5513 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 493 HP |
Torque | 164 Nm | 800 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |