1962 Holden EK vs. 2003 Mitsubishi Dion
To start off, 2003 Mitsubishi Dion is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Mitsubishi Dion (133 HP) has 69 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Mitsubishi Dion should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mitsubishi Dion (183 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2003 Mitsubishi Dion will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Holden EK | 2003 Mitsubishi Dion | |
Make | Holden | Mitsubishi |
Model | EK | Dion |
Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 133 HP |
Torque | 164 Nm | 183 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |