1962 Holden EK vs. 2003 Subaru Legacy
To start off, 2003 Subaru Legacy is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2003 Subaru Legacy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Subaru Legacy (241 HP) has 177 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Subaru Legacy should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Subaru Legacy (297 Nm) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2003 Subaru Legacy will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2003 Subaru Legacy | |
| Make | Holden | Subaru |
| Model | EK | Legacy |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 241 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 297 Nm |
