1962 Holden EK vs. 2004 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2004 Jaguar XK is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Jaguar XK (290 HP) has 226 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Jaguar XK (394 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2004 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2004 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Holden | Jaguar |
| Model | EK | XK |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 3996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 290 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 394 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
