1962 Holden EK vs. 2004 Kia Optima
To start off, 2004 Kia Optima is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,671 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Kia Optima is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Kia Optima (170 HP) has 106 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Kia Optima should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Kia Optima (245 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2004 Kia Optima will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2004 Kia Optima | |
| Make | Holden | Kia |
| Model | EK | Optima |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 170 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 245 Nm |
