1962 Holden EK vs. 2004 Mazda MPV
To start off, 2004 Mazda MPV is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda MPV (200 HP) has 136 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mazda MPV (267 Nm) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2004 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2004 Mazda MPV | |
| Make | Holden | Mazda |
| Model | EK | MPV |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 200 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 267 Nm |
