1962 Holden EK vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML (187 HP) has 123 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML (440 Nm) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Holden EK | 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Holden | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | EK | ML |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 187 HP |
Torque | 164 Nm | 440 Nm |