1962 Holden EK vs. 2004 Rover 25
To start off, 2004 Rover 25 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Rover 25 (83 HP) has 19 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Rover 25 should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Holden EK (164 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Rover 25. (110 Nm). This means 1962 Holden EK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Rover 25.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Holden EK | 2004 Rover 25 | |
Make | Holden | Rover |
Model | EK | 25 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 83 HP |
Torque | 164 Nm | 110 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |