1962 Holden EK vs. 2004 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2004 Toyota Celica is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,260 cc (6 cylinders), 1962 Holden EK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Celica (140 HP) has 76 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Toyota Celica (170 Nm) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2004 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2004 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Holden | Toyota |
| Model | EK | Celica |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 1794 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 140 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 170 Nm |
