1962 Holden EK vs. 2004 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 2,901 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo XC90 (268 HP) has 204 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo XC90 (380 Nm) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2004 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
1962 Holden EK | 2004 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Holden | Volvo |
Model | EK | XC90 |
Year Released | 1962 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2260 cc | 2901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 64 HP | 268 HP |
Torque | 164 Nm | 380 Nm |