1962 Holden EK vs. 2005 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2005 Jaguar XJR is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Holden EK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Holden EK would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jaguar XJR (390 HP) has 326 more horse power than 1962 Holden EK. (64 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1962 Holden EK.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jaguar XJR (554 Nm) has 390 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Holden EK. (164 Nm). This means 2005 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Holden EK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1962 Holden EK | 2005 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Holden | Jaguar |
| Model | EK | XJR |
| Year Released | 1962 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2260 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 64 HP | 390 HP |
| Torque | 164 Nm | 554 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
